Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Isolation - Edward Thomas and Robert Frost Essays

Both Poets write about the isolation of the individual in their poetry Compare and contrast two poems, one by each poet, taking account of the methods which each poet uses to write about the isolation of the individual. Both poets write about the isolation of the individual in their poems An Old Man’s Winter’s Night and Man And Dog. Frost depicts an elderly individual who is isolated form others because of the harshness of the natural environment around him. Whilst Thomas depicts a nomadic individual who wanders the countryside and who, In contrast to Frosts character embraces his isolation, choosing instead a â€Å"brown bitch† for his only company To begin with, Thomas writes in rhyming couplets which create an on-going effect of the†¦show more content†¦In Man and Dog even though the individual is isolated, he recognises that others are worse off than he is, he recognises that things could be a lot worse for him and this is conveyed through the line, â€Å"Many a man sleeps worse tonight than I shall†. In AOMWN this contrasts to, â€Å"What kept his eyes from giving back the gaze†, the alliteration shows that the man is at odds with his environment, that this is not a place for a vulnerable old man and this further isolates him from others. In addition to this each poet describes a different response to isolation, Frost depicts an individual who is comfortable being isolated and makes the most of the situation which he finds himself in whereas Thomas depicts an individual who no longer wants to be isolated from others. In Man and Dog the line, â€Å"I’ll get no shakedown with that bedfellow from farmers†, the man cuts himself off from others, he chooses his isolation. In contrast to this in AOMWN the litote, â€Å"A light he was to no one but himself† implies that it is not by choice that the man chooses to be isolated, but rather through his inability to communicate to others. In addition to this in Man and Dog a â€Å"leaf-coloured robin watched†, the visual imagery shows how the man is close to nature, he makes the best of his isolation and isShow MoreRelatedRobert Frost s Writing Style1589 Words   |  7 Pages Robert Frost once said, â€Å"The figure a poem makes. It begins in delight and ends in wisdom... in a clarification of life - not necessarily a great clarification, such as sects and cults are founded on, but in a momentary stay against confusion† (Robert Frost Quotes). This same kind of thinking opened the door for metaphorical poetry that helped to show the poets transparency. His love for the social outcast and the struggles of his life are exhibited greatly in his poems. Robert Frost helpedRead MoreRobert Frost : A New England Poet3698 Words   |  15 PagesRobert Lee Frost Known for being a New England poet Robert Frost was born in San Francisco, California on March 26th, 1874. Born to a New England father William Prescott Frost Jr. and a Scottish mother Isabelle Moodie who moved to the west coast from Pennsylvania after marriage (Bailey). Both his parents were teachers and poets themselves, but his father later became a journalist with the San Francisco Evening Bulletin (Bailey). Frost spent 12 years of his life growing up in San Francisco, untilRead MoreThe Poetry Of Robert Frost3137 Words   |  13 Pagesexamine the poetry of Robert Frost for references to themes of nature, religion, and humanity and how they relate to each other. This exercise will be prefaced with a brief introduction to the man and his life as a segue to better understanding Frost’s verse. The unexpected but unavoidable aim of this composition will be to realize that Frost’s body of work is almost too sophisticated to comprehend, his manipulation of language so el usive that each reader may believe Frost is speaking only to themRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Samuel Taylor Coleridge3984 Words   |  16 PagesSamuel Taylor Coleridge was an influential British philosopher, critic, and writer of the early eighteenth century. He was a prominent member of a literary group known as the â€Å"Lake Poets,† which included renowned writers like William Wordsworth and Robert Southey. His writings and philosophy greatly contributed to the formation and construction of modern thought. He possessed an extensive, creative imagination, and developed his own imagination theories in his writings. However, his personal life wasRead MoreStrategic Human Resource Management View.Pdf Uploaded Successfully133347 Words   |  534 Pagesproduction facilities or a superior product are usually not enough to sustain an advantage over competitors. Physical facilities can be duplicated, cloned, or reverse-engineered and no longer provide a sustainable advantage.2 St rategists James Quinn, Thomas Doorley, and Penny Paquette have argued that â€Å"maintainable advantage usually derives from outstanding depth in selected human skills, logistics capabilities, knowledge bases, or other service strengths that competitors cannot reproduce . . .†.3 ThusRead MoreANALIZ TEXT INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS28843 Words   |  116 Pagesdeliberately arranged sequence of interrelated events that constitute the basic narrative structure of a novel or a short story. Events of any kind, of course, inevitably involve people, and for this reason it is virtually impossible to discuss plot in isolation from character. Character and plot are, in fact, intimately and reciprocally related, especially in modern fiction. A major function of plot can be said to be the representation of characters in action, though as we will see the action involved canRead MoreLangston Hughes Research Paper25309 Words   |  102 Pagesshort stories. He said, [They] made my hair stan d on end. In some of Lawrences characters he recognized his own personality flaws and those of acquaintances. He began writing powerful short stories with psychological conflicts involving racial isolation, class segregation, and sexual dilemmas. Maxim Lieber, his new agent, sold these dramatic stories to American Mercury magazine. In 1933, Hughes stood near the reviewing stand as Soviet dictator Josef Stalin, Foreign Secretary V.M. Molotov, andRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pageshave not been or cannot be empirically tested. Hence, positivism combines what we have called an objectivist epistemology and a realist ontology (Figure 1.7). It is widely agreed that positivism is pivotal to management for two reasons. First, as Thomas (1997) notes, ‘Positivism holds the promise of techniques for controlling the world’ (p. 693) with which managers expect to be provided. Second, provided that managers appear practically to use neutral scientific knowledge, their subsequent practicesRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages, with David DeCenzo (Wiley, 2010) Prentice Hall’s Self-Assessment Library 3.4 (Prentice Hall, 2010) Fundamentals of Management, 8th ed., with David De Cenzo and Mary Coulter (Prentice Hall, 2013) Supervision Today! 7th ed., with David DeCenzo and Robert Wolter (Prentice Hall, 2013) Training in Interpersonal Skills: TIPS for Managing People at Work, 6th ed., with Phillip Hunsaker (Prentice Hall, 2012) Managing Today! 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, 2000) Organization Theory, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, 1990)Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesCentral Design: Jayne Conte Cover Art: Getty Images, Inc. Cover Design: Suzanne Duda Lead Media Project Manager: Denise Vaughn Full-Service Project Management: Sharon Anderson/BookMasters, Inc. Composition: Integra Software Services Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers Cover Printer: Coral Graphics Text Font: 10/12 Weidemann-Book Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on appropriate page within text. Copyright  © 2011, 2007,

Monday, December 9, 2019

Essay on AICD NFP Governance and Performance Study

Question: Write an essay onThe AICD NFP Governance and Performance Study. Answer: The AICD NFP Governance and Performance Study 2015 (AICD 2015b, p. 23) found, NFP boards rate their skills in strategy development and oversight of strategy implementation at 6.6 out of 10 - with room for improvement. From the outsets, the role of board highlights the amount of time that the board members expected to spend to develop a strategy that will help the company to run properly in future (Reynolds 2014). A boards effectiveness in setting strategic direction depends on five characteristics - size, independence, reputation, activity and diversity (Spearritt and Butcher 2010). According to the NFP Governance and Performance Study 2015 (AICD 2015b, pp.11, 16), Australian Charities Report 2014 (Leblanc 2015) and Guaging the State of Not-for-profit 2015 (Macdonald 2013), some of the prime facts that stood out regarding the role of the board in setting strategic direction are: The top priority of the board in developing strategies is to maintain financial sustainability. As the NFPs focus is on the richer mix of diversifying income streams, cost, management and increasing own source of income, simple cost management has diminished as an imperative (Anand and Jog 2014) 41% of directors believe they require to develop their present level of skills in strategic planning (AICD 2015b, p. 23) Almost half of the directors believe that the board of NFPs is very effective in order to measure the organizational performances against its mission (Pro Bono 2015, p. 8) Therefore, SEs has to develop corporate structure in such a way that could able to fulfil all its requirements. However, NFPs and SEs are completely two different factors. Therefore, strategy development also will have to be different as compared to NFPs. Otherwise, SEs might not able to fulfil its actual objective (Du Plessis, O'Sullivan and Rentschler 2014). Since, board members have major role in recruiting, supervising, and evaluating the organizational process. Boards have to create proper strategy that will help the SE to gain advantage in the market. Since, many SEs are also works as for-profit. Therefore, strategy of SEs will definitely have to be different from the NEPs. Board members also provide direction for the organizations. This crucial in strategy development, as without selecting a proper objective no strategy can be formulated. Board members are the higher authority of the company (Elms 2014). Therefore, they play a significant role in developing relationship with t he government organization. This is a key aspect for developing any strategy for social enterprises. A board of directors is a combination of individuals focusing on to operate an organization as a group. In social enterprises, strategy formulation not only focuses on the profit margin of the company but also help the society as a whole. However, not all the social enterprises are a not-for-profit firm (Strong 2014). Therefore, strategy formulation of the company will have to consider both the aspect such as increasing the profit of the company and also improving the amount of benefits that the company is currently providing to the society. Hence, the strategy formulation for the SEs is far more difficult and demands combinations of approach. As per the 2014 Chairman and Non-Executive Director Survey, the role of the higher authority such as EDs and NEDs become even more crucial in developing a particular strategy for the company. The strategy development in the social enterprise demands huge amount of skills, which companies failed to get sometime (Atkinson 2012). It leads to the o rganizational failure. Therefore, many boards and management have struggled to formulate appropriate division of strategy that will help the company to operate much more effectively. References: Anand, A.I. and Jog, V.M., 2014. Diversity on Boards.Available at SSRN 2469410. Atkinson, M., 2012. Developing and using a performance management framework: a case study.Measuring business excellence,16(3), pp.47-56. Du Plessis, J., O'Sullivan, J. and Rentschler, R., 2014. Multiple layers of gender diversity on corporate boards: To force or not to force.Deakin L. Rev.,19, p.1. Elms, N.E., 2014. An exploratory study into director selection: who do directors want on their boards and how do they select them?. Leblanc, R.W., 2015. FACC 6600Corporate Governance Course OutlineFall 2015.Available at SSRN 2656628. Macdonald, R.J., 2013. Determining best practices for board evaluation for a provincial commercial Crown corporation. Reynolds, S.T., 2014.Effective Corporate Governance in Not-for-profit Organisations(Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University). Spearritt, K. and Butcher, S., 2010. Company Secretary: Promoting Board Diversity to Enhance Performance.Keeping good companies,62(6), p.332. Strong, P., 2014. Integrated reporting-where are we now?.

Monday, December 2, 2019

The Significance of the Korean War

Table of Contents Introduction Events Leading up to the Korean War Impacts of the War Conclusion Bibliography Footnotes Introduction One of the major results of the Second World War was the emergence of two world super powers; the United States of America and the Soviet Union. These two powers appeared to be pitted against each other from an ideological point of view resulting in high polarization. The United States favored communism while the Soviet Union was pro communism and aimed to spread this ideology to its spheres of influence.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Significance of the Korean War specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The Soviet Union was keen on spreading communism while the United States was equally keen on advancing capitalism or at least curbing the spread of communism. One of the fronts on which this ideological war was fought was along the North and South Korea since North Korea was a communism sphere of influence while the south was a capitalism sphere. However, this ideological war escalated into a fully fledged military operation making it the first major war after the Second World War. Historians agree that the Korean War had a strong influence on US policy and the international history. Bearing the huge significance of the Korean War, this paper shall conduct a concise yet informative research on the impacts of the Korean War on the US. Events Leading up to the Korean War The Korean peninsula prior to the end of the Second World War was under the control of the Japanese. Following the defeat of the Japanese and the subsequent end of World War II in 1945, the Korean Peninsula had an opportunity to regain its full sovereignty. However, this was not to be the case. Henneka documents that this â€Å"liberation† of the Korean Peninsula was started by the Soviet troops from the north which the American troops advanced from the South[1]. The two liber ators, The US and the Soviets agreed to demarcate the Korean Peninsula at the thirty-eighth parallel line. This demarcation was meant to be a temporal one but over time, the Korean Peninsula became a front for the rivalry between the two world powers with the North being a Soviet sphere of influence and the South being an American sphere of influence. The political influence of the two rivals (Soviets and the US) on the Korean society was monumental and Henneka states that â€Å"the two Koreas started their new life in dependence of their military and political protectors; the US and the Soviet Union†[2]. The war was sparked by the North Korea who invaded the South in 1950 with the sole goal of reunifying the two Koreas by force. Following the defeat of the Japanese, the US had taken up control of the political and administrational structures of South Korea therefore assuming the role of the hated Japanese Imperialists.Advertising Looking for research paper on history? L et's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The North therefore viewed the US as an imperialist taking over from Japan and the invasion was meant to liberate the South. The Korean War was devastating to both the North and the South and it is deemed to be one of the world’s most destructive wars in terms of the proportion of the population that was affected. Hang Shin documents that the war resulted in the decline of the South Korean population by approximately 2million and the creation of over half a million refugees[3]. The War ended in a stalemate with the North being a communist state and the South being a capital state under the protection of the US. However, the war which lasted from 1950 to 1953 had huge significances to the United States. Impacts of the War A major impact of the war was the radical change of the United States’ perception of the communist threat. Before the war, officials in the US held mixed feelings about the Soviet Union and while some perceived them as a real danger, the Soviets were seen as weak and incapable of carrying out war. Following the Korean War, Jervis records that the US now viewed communism as a force that was not only willing but also intent on attacking free nations so as to expand their influence[4]. The Korean War was seen as direct evidence that communism was willing to resort to armed aggression whenever it perceived that it could win the war. The Korean War resulted in a monumental increase of the US defense budget. These increases could not have been possible without the new policies that came about as a result of the Korean conflict. Before the Korean way, the US government faced budgetary restrictions that prevented it from enhancing its defense or even offering foreign assistance on the high levels that it wanted to. As a result of the Korean War, there was large public support for a stronger military since the communist threat was more real to the Americans and they were therefore willing to be taxed more to fund the military[5]. Daggett when talking about the costs of the Korean War for the United States notes that the US engaged in a large buildup of forces not just for the Korean war but in readiness for deployment elsewhere in the world should the need arise[6].Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Significance of the Korean War specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Before the Korean War, the US was involved in helping the war-torn European nations rebuild themselves through the European Recovery Program (commonly known as the Marshall plan) which began in 1948-1951. This plan which is still hailed as the most successful aid plan ever implemented by the US was mostly aimed at economic recovery of the European nations. However, this plan also touched on security issues by establishing a military alliance in the form of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Trachtenberg notes that NATO was not militarized and it was hugely a symbol of the long-term American commitment to Europe and it aimed towards a greater degree of military integration[7]. The Korean War resulted in the militarization of NATO since the US saw the need to have a strong conventional defense force capable of countering the communist threat in Europe. Following the Korean War, the US was also keen to develop a large NATO army whose troops would come from the US and great contributions from Britain, France and German. The rearmament of Germany (which had been disarmed following the end of the Second World War) was also precipitated by the Korean War. Before the Korean War, there was fear that any war between the West and the Communism forces would result in a Third World War. This was a scenario that was viewed as hugely undesirable and for this reason, the US went into great troubles to ensure that diplomatic means were used to quell disputes between capitalism and communism before they erupted into full scale wars. Prior to the Korean War, the US had held the assumption that war in any part of the world against communism would be unrestrained. The Korean War showed that it was possible to take part in limited wars where the dispute was limited to conventional forces at a particular geographical position[8]. The Korean War proved that the idea of limited war could be realized without posing a threat to the world. The US was from then on more willing to engage in limited wars as is demonstrated from the Vietnam Wars. The Korean War also resulted in deterioration in Chinese-American relationships. While the relationship between the US and China were bad even before the war, China’s entry into the Korean War in support of North Korea and her Russian allies reinforced the notion to the US that China was a hostile nation. Jervis notes that while China joined the war as a result of its own personal interests in protecting itself from the perceived aggression by the United Nations forces, the US saw China as acting under the instructions of the Soviet Union[9].Advertising Looking for research paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The war therefore resulted in the change of China policy since now China was seen to be on the same side as the Soviet Union. The Chinese entity in the war therefore resulted in a solidification of the perception of a Sino-Soviet bloc. The US henceforth sought to strengthen her allies in the region (South Korea and Japan) by stationing military bases in the region as well as funding military spending for the countries so as to counter the perceived threat. In addition to this, the US became visibly anti-Chinese following the Korean War since China had in the eyes of the US proven herself to be an enemy. Another impact of the Korean War is that it resulted in the profound change of US policy by globalizing the U.S. commitment. The war led to the adoption of a belief by the US that any communist victory would greatly threaten vital American interests. The US role in Indochina where the US offered economic and military aid was as a direct result of the policy changes that resulted from the Korean War. Jervis states that following the Korean War, the US worked under the assumption that â€Å"the whole of Southeast Asia is in danger of falling under Communist domination†[10]. While prior to the Korean War the US would have been reluctant to commit her troops and resources to reverse such a situation, the Korean War led to the preference of military intervention by the US to prevent a communist victory. Another impact of the Korean War is that it placed North Korea as a major security risk to the Unite States. The direct attack initiated on South Korean by the North against supposed American imperialism demonstrated that North Korea was willing to undertake provocative actions against the US. This is a stance that is still held to the present day where the acquisition of nuclear warheads by the North is a major concern for the US which views Pyongyang as being willing to perpetrate acts of war from a historical view[11]. The Korean War enhanced the commitment of the US to the containment policy. The containment policy was proposed by United States diplomat George Kennan and it was primarily a policy designed to curb Soviet expansionism that seemed eminent following the end of the Second World War[12]. The containment policy was deemed necessary in light of the increasing influence of communism ideology in Eastern Europe and parts of Asia. In the cause of the Korean War, the US was tempted to endorse the rollback policy which would in essence have seen the destruction of North Koreas government and a take over by the US led UN forces. The failure of this policy during the Korean War resulted in the US reverting back to the containment policy which was summed up by the Truman Doctrine in which the US pledged to â€Å"support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures†[13]. This containment policy was hugely successful in that it kept Soviet aggression at Bay. Kang authoritativel y states that the relative peace and stability on the Korean peninsula even in the face of predictions of war by many scholars has been proof that deterrence works[14]. Conclusion This paper set out to examine one of the major wars in which the US was involved in; the Korean War or 1950. The paper has proceeded to highlight the events that led to the way and gone on to examine the various impacts that the Korean War had on the United States. The consequences that the war had on US policy as well as her relationship with other countries have been articulated. From this paper, it is clear that the Korean War had immense impacts on the United States. It is this war more than any other single factor that resulted in the significant increase in the United State’s military spending. In addition to this, the war led to the globalization of the United States commitments as it viewed any local conflict as a test of strength between itself and the Soviet Union. Bibliography Daggett, St ephen. â€Å"Costs of Major U.S. Wars†. Congressional Research Service. 2010. Eui Hang Shin. â€Å"Effects of the Korean War on Social Structures of the Republic of Korea†. International Journal of Korean Studies, 2001. Henneka, Andreas. â€Å"Reflections on Korean History and its Impacts on the US-North Korean Conflict†. Journal on Science and World Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006 19-27. Jervis, Robert. The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, No. 4 (Dec., 1980), pp. 563-592 Kang, David. International Relations Theory and the Second Korean War. International Studies Quarterly (2003) 47, 301–324 Richard Abrams, â€Å"America Transformed: Sixty Years of Revolutionary Change, 1941-2001.† (Cambridge University Press, 2006), 69. Trachtenberg, Marc. â€Å"A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement 1945-1963†. Princeton University Press, 1999. Watson, Cynthia. â€Å"U.S. National Secu rity: a Reference Handbook.† ABC-CLIO, 2002. Footnotes Andreas Henneka, â€Å"Reflections on Korean history and its impacts on the US-North Korean conflict† (Journal on Science and World Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006), 21. Andreas, 22. Eui Hang Shin, â€Å"Effects of the Korean War on Social Structures of the Republic of Korea†, (International Journal of Korean Studies, 2001), 133. Robert Jervis, â€Å"The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War† (The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, No. 4 Dec., 1980), 579. Jervis, 580. Stephen Daggett, â€Å"Costs of Major U.S. Wars† (Congressional Research Service, 2010), 4. Marc Trachtenberg, â€Å"A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement 1945-1963† (Princeton University Press, 1999), 120. Jervis, 581. Jervis, 583. Jervis, 587. David Kang, â€Å"International Relations Theory and the Second Korean War†, (International Studies Quarterly, 2003), 302. Cynthia Watson, â€Å"U .S. National Security: a Reference Handbook† (ABC-CLIO, 2002), 44 Richard Abrams, â€Å"America Transformed: Sixty Years of Revolutionary Change, 1941-2001.† (Cambridge University Press, 2006), 69. David, 302. This research paper on The Significance of the Korean War was written and submitted by user Abdullah H. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.